Savage Republican

Under GWB in five years, the government has expanded more than under WJC in eight years. Huh? And it started at least three years before GWB ever took office . The congress in 1997 was firmly Republican, and yet, look what happened with the Republicans in charge of Congress. And it wasn’t until the Repubs were in charge of the White House AND Congress that we really started the government expansion explosion!
So, I have no idea why the lefties whine…unless it’s the eternal “No amount of money spent is ever enough. Any tax cut is too much, and any tax increase is always too small.”
As I heard it said before there are only two political parties: The party of Big Government (with its right wing [Republicans] and left wing [Democrats]) and the libertarians.
It used to be that I used to say that a new Republican (like Norm Coleman) only slowed down the growth of government from a Wellstonian 198 mph to only a neocon 137 mph (meaning we just bled to death at a slightly slower rate). Now it’s not even that.
All that red ink? It’s really blood. And I’m blacking out…

From my most recent email from The Patriot Post:
“Here’s my immigration ‘compromise’: We need to regularize the situation of the 298 million non-undocumented residents of the United States. Right now, we get a lousy deal compared with the 15 million fine upstanding members of the Undocumented American community. I think the 298 million of us in the overdocumented segment of the population should get the chance to be undocumented. You know when President Bush talks about all those undocumented people ‘living in the shadows’? Doesn’t that sound kinda nice? Living in the shadows, no government agencies harassing you for taxes and numbers and paperwork.” —Mark Steyn
The greatest of all the human freedoms? The freedom to be left alone.From the Declaration of Independence: HE has erected a Multitude of new Offices, and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harrass our People, and eat out their Substance.
And I’ll suggest again that the next time you are at a stoplight, look around and find one thing that is not taxed and/or regulated at some level of government, if not multiple levels of government. And realize again, the Cost of Government Day is in July. You work over half the year to pay for the total cost of government. And it’s going to get worse. Much worse.
I like Mr. Steyn’s idea.
I want to be left alone.

A real “culture of corruption” Part II from the junior Senator from NY.
And just a bit more about the Ex-Co-President.

There is an old proverb I once heard that I repeat often:”the beginning of wisdom is to call all things by their right names.” That means good is good, evil is evil, right is right, wrong is wrong. In the Bible, the greatest admonition is “Woe”. It basically means “No hope.”
Isaiah 5:20 is a dire warning to those who don’t call things by their right names. And this means the left.
The left is excellent at demonizing (to cause to appear wicked and/or evil in the eyes of others is the true meaning of the word). Everything that falls out of their mouths is about “rights”. The word “responsibility” is never applied to them or the victims they make up and claim to champion. And this is never more true now. The cause du’ jour? “Immigration Rights”.
Well, you evil doers on the left, we already have immigrants rights. What you want is rights for criminals. Come here legally, you have rights. Come here illegally…
And notice how in the latest batch of well timed spontaneous demonstrations there is an absence of Mexican flags? Seems the handlers of these criminals got smart and that showing the Mexican flag showed the true beliefs of these lawbreakers and their spokesmen. And what gets lost in all this is what about my rights as a citizen? Your rights as a citizen?
Read how the debate is framed (from The Detroit Free Press ):
Tens of thousands of people, mostly Latinos, protested legislation that would make it a crime to help undocumented immigrants. – Uh, that’s “illegal immigrants”. And when you help a known criminal, that’s called “aiding and abetting”.
Some of the Wolverine workers were undocumented, Herrada and one of the workers said, and wanted to march in the Detroit rally to show their support for immigrant rights.– We already have immigrants rights. They’re protesting to make criminals legal, just kill the law.
“It was not fair,'” said Mercedes, a 31-year-old Detroit woman who attended the rally and was fired. “We went to fight for our rights.” Mercedes is undocumented and asked that her last name not be used.
“It was really unfair of a company to do that,” said Edith Castillo, head of the Detroit-based Latin Americans for Social and Economic Development.-Yup-not obeying the law, not going through the process. It’s all about “fairness”. And what’s really unfair is that these illegals are in jobs that Detroit’s black LEGAL citizens could be doing. THAT’S what’s unfair.And notice Mercedes is an ILLEGAL ans she whines about fairness. No gratitude that Wolverine Packing may have managers hauled off to jail for hiring her. “We went to fight for our rights!” she blubbers like a three year old. And what rights are those? Please be specific.
And not a whit of gratitude toward The Wolverine Packing Plant for giving them jobs. Not a whit of gratitude for being in a country that allows these protests. Why aren’t they going back to Mexico if America is so unfair, so intolerant. What would happen if they protested the corruption of the Mexican government…in Mexico City?
And, for S&G’s let’s extend the rhetoric with a re-defining of terms:
Carjacking:unauthorized transit/transport requisition.
Rape:Non-qualified and perhaps impermissible sexual encounter.
Bank robbery: Undocumented non-customer withdrawal.
Armed bank robbery:Undocumented non-customer withdrawal with inappropriate duress to the employees
Assault:unwelcomed insensitive physical moment.
Just a few thoughts.

Seems the more things change, the more they stay the same.
From nearly a year ago I was blogging on the Mexican border and illegal immigrants (that means they’re criminals entering America) both here and here.
And here is the warning to the president from the same time.
GWB has had five years to address this problem. And plenty of Americans warning him.
And now we have the criminal coddlers on the left crying “fairness, rights, etc.”
And GWB has no one but himself to blame for inaction and then wrong action.
This does not bode well for Republicans this fall.
The conservatives who believe in laws are becoming very, very discouraged. Nah, that’s not accurate. They are becoming more and more discouraged.
And as Dick Nixon said “You can’t win with the conservatives alone, but you can’t win without them.”

There is a report in both the Pioneer Press and Prairie Pravda on an unprovoked vicious attack on an innocent storekeeper in Vadnais Heights. Read the differences in the descriptions of these two cowards:
Prairie Pravda-The attackers were two men described as about 5-foot-8 and in their late teens to mid-20s. They both wore dark clothing and dark baseball caps. One of them had close-cropped hair on the sides with a small ponytail in back. Anyone with information about the case is asked to call the sheriff’s office at 651-484-3366.
Pioneer Press-The attackers were described as Hispanic males, each about 5-feet-8 and in their late teens to mid-20s. The man with the knife was wearing a dark blue or long-sleeved hooded sweatshirt. During the melee, Al-Bosaad managed to pull out the hood’s drawstring.

The other suspect was described as having the sides of his head close-shaved, and he had a short “rattail” in the back. He was wearing a dark blue or black short-sleeved T-shirt, as well as a baseball cap with what might be the logo of the NHL’s Los Angeles Kings.

The sheriff asked that anyone with possible information about the suspects call the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Department at 651-484-3366.

Which paper has helped keep the community and innocent citizens safe by helping to apprehend these vicious criminals? Remember this was an unprovoked attack. These two walked in and with no warning leapt and attacked. They will do it again. They have probably already been involved in previous deadly assaults.
And, that it appears Prairie Pravda has an agenda favoring criminals (as it’s coverage of the “spontaneous demonstrations for ‘immigrants rights'”) is there a link? Also remember, Prairie Pravda refused to give a full description of of the shooters in the Uptown murder of Mr. Zebuhr.
And as a final twist of irony, Prairie Pravda reports: “We want to catch them soon,” Fletcher said. “The next time they do this, the likelihood of the victim surviving the attack is slim.” and then provides the above less than full description.

Sins of omission are just as egregious and as vile as sins of commission.

Yup, always more of your money can be spent. And the governor believes that you haven’t had enough of your money spent to prop up failed Minneapolis government policies. Not enough out of your pocket to the lefties of our largest city.
And what I find absolutely amazing is that in a budget of $1,240,000,000 the City of Minneapolis finds it impossible, absolutely impossible to find less than .2% (two tenths of one percent) to cut to come up with the $2,000,000 of your money the governor has so generously given R.T. Rybak.
Oh, and by the way, that $2,000,000 is only for the summer.
But not to worry. I have every confidence that you’ll be able to earn more this year to have the governor take from you to give away to help those governed by the enlightened of Minneapolis.
So, be alert for all those overtime opportunities. After all, only you can help R.T. Rybak keep Minneapolis as safe as it’s always been.

Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. – In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself out­side the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.

– Sir Karl Popper, in relation to his remarks in his The Open Society about Plato’s Republic. Karl R. Popper, The Spell of Plato, Vol. I of The Open Society and its Enemies (New York: Harper Torchbooks/Harper & Row Publishers, 1963), footnote 4 to ch. 7, 265.

This is what Sir Karl was alluding to in his remarks:

“A short bus ride from Paris, a world capital of romance, teen-age girls trapped in soulless, Soviet-style housing complexes are too scared to wear skirts and balk at the idea of dating.
Imprisoned behind yellowed curtains that hang limply at windows, they stay indoors to avoid the jeers, bullying and the ominous risk of rape that lurks in dingy stairwells where gangs of boys of mostly North African origin hang out.”

and this:

“Over half of all convicted rapists in Denmark are Muslims even though Muslim immigrants constitute hardly five percent of the Danish population. “

The American Melting pot has been replaced by multiculturalism to disasterous results. Don’t believe me, take a look at the marchers in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York. Hundreds of thousands of hypeneated Americans took to the streets of these American cities, flying the flag of a foreign government demanding that we reward their illegal behavior with citizenship – putting them ahead of the line of those who have worked hard to come here “the right way”. Now I don’t fully agree with my Republican counterparts on how to resolve this problem, but I do know that putting everyone who came here illegally 5 years ago, ahead of someone who did come here legally 10 years ago on the citizenship track is wrong! It is not fair to those who followed our laws.

Have we come to a point where we must tolerate all sorts of criminal/abhorrent behavior (rape and murder)? What comes next? Tolerating things like genital mutilation? When are we finally going to have the backbone to say “NO” to illegal behavior? When are we finally going to recognize that sometimes a little intolerance is the preferable alternative?

Did you know that there is an American POW in this war? You wouldn’t if you only got your news from the alphabet soup of networks?

Thankfully for the LA Times, who had this story on our only POW.

“On April 9, 2004, while on a security detail protecting a civilian convoy west of Baghdad, Matt’s unit was attacked. As bullets flew, the young man was abducted. Within days, the kidnappers released grainy video of the weary-looking 20-year-old, wearing camouflage and surrounded by five masked men. About three months later, another video was released of a man being shot in the back of the head and falling into a shallow grave. The narrator claimed it was Keith Matthew Maupin.But the video never showed the soldier’s face. Matt’s body was never recovered. There has been no proof of his death — not then, and not now, two years later — so the military considers him to be alive.”

So the next time you hear someone caterwauling about the “inhumane treatment” of the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, remember Sgt Maupin and his family and pray…pray for the family that they get an answer on their missing son. And maybe ask the alphabet soup networks why they have not reported on Sgt Maupin.

Ahhhh, Nicky, Nicky, Nicky. Do you have any idea how many RATIONAL ,THINKING people find you such a rich source of ironic humor? In your recent screed, you whine that the Somali community deserves an apology from us cracker members of the KKK . That there was a description of the assailants of Mr. Zebuhr possibly being Somali, or East Africans. You go on your lefty racist rant that “bad guys are bad guys whatever their color or caliber they carry.” Not from your point Nicky. I noticed that you and your employer never even gave a partial, let alone full description of the assailants (though it was readily and almost immediately available from the police), other than to say “suspects” or “anyone with information on the robbery…”. At least KSTP was trying to eliminate suspects. But not you guys. You excoriate KSTP and others by saying “Other TV stations followed Channel 5’s lead. An entire ethnic group was under suspicion, without any description of what the killers looked like. ” You guys never gave ANY description so therefore ALL “ethnic” groups were under suspicion. How many people got into cars that evening? How many “young men” were in Uptown that day? And the Stars official policy “At the Star Tribune, newsroom policy allows the race of suspects to be reported when race “can be used as part of larger description of a crime suspect,” including “standard categories of identification such as age, build or weight, height and hair style or color, or includes some of those categories plus other very specific identifiers such as scars or clothing.”

If police are looking for a 5-foot-10 black suspect about 20 years old weighing 180 pounds in a Vikings jacket with a tattoo on his face, shaved head and an apparent Somali accent, that should make it into the newspaper. But “police are looking for a Norwegian or possibly a Scandinavian”?” No Nick, you moron. But, you hypocritical twit, you didn’t do that did you? That was the type of description on the police blotter that YOU refused to run. White, black, Hispanic, Asian. That helps. But, that’s not what you said. What you said was “two youths”,”suspects”, “anyone with information…” with no description other than “young males”? That’s your version of Norwegian possibly Scandinavian. You’re an idiot Nick. No, worse. By deliberately refusing to issue a full and complete description of the assailants , you let these thugs and murderers run lose. You did nothing to bring them to justice.You endangered many others by willfully refusing to help in their apprehension. And now that we know they were and are black, you also endangered other blacks by not giving that full description that would have aided in their apprehension, as most violence by blacks is against other blacks. And you dare preach to us. Shut up, you weasel.Do something useful and helpful Nick, like writing ad copy for mortgage brokers or something. But, don’t ever, ever preach to me, you pusillanimous hypocrite.
Anti-Strib nails it really well.

There. I’ve vented and feel such a sense of closure over this and really feel like we’ve bridged our differences here…