This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.


The Savage Republican



Local Attractions

Favorite Links

Remember, Being a Savage Republican is not where you are from, but what you believe.


Previous Posts

Archives


Thursday, November 03, 2005

Whose lies are they anyway?

The Dems love to harp about "lies" that were told leading up to the war, but just who has been lying to whom?

The Dems say that the Bush Administration told America that there was a 9/11 link to Saddam and yet in his interview with the
Rocky Mountain News, Vice President Cheney said " "[O]n the 9/11 question, we've never had confirmation one way or another." However, the UK Guardian did claim that there was an Iraq/al Qaeda link in this 1999 report

The Dems have said that there Saddam had NO WMD's. However, Iraq disclosures to the U.N., culminating in September 1997, admitted that Iraq had produced large quantities of the banned weapons. In its
1999 UNSCOM report, the United Nations concluded that Iraq had under-reported its production of those materials, including anthrax and VX, had systematically lied to and deceived the U.N. inspectors, and had wholly failed to account for the weapons' current whereabouts. (See, for example, paragraph 85.) And the U.N., in its March 2003 UNMOVIC report, concluded: "Based on all the available evidence, the strong presumption is that about 10,000 litres of anthrax was not destroyed and may still exist." Then there is this BBC report that talks about the bomb making factory that was discovered in Baghdad in 2003. It also mentions an encounter that the Polish coalition troops had "On Friday, Poland's defence ministry said its troops in Iraq had thwarted an attempt by militants to buy a quantity of warheads containing nerve agents. " Warheads equipped with nerve agents.....and those aren't WMD's????? This report talks about all of the other WMD's that were found shortly after going into Iraq. Funny how the Democratic leadership chooses not to utilize this data...

The infamous 16 words in the State of the Union Address...the Dems say that the President said (in his 2003 State of the Union address) that Saddam bought yellowcake uranium from the government of Niger (whose main export is - surprise - yellowcake uranium) a claim which Joseph Wilson claimed to have debunked. According to Wilson, this claim was based on a forged US intelligence document. The problem is that is not what the president said. The quote was “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa,”. I realize that the words "sought" and "bought" are similar in sound and spelling, but the meanings are very different! Then there is this little gem from
the BBC that talks about the 1.77 tons of enriched uranium that was secretly taken out of Iraq by the US government. Meanwhile, the Butler Report reaffirmed the President's claim and the accuracy of the real original report.

So there you have it.....the lies of the Iraq War and the liars who told them. Are there any more lies that we need to discuss?????

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

What do you do when a child steals?

I have mentioned before, I am the parent of a wonderful child. Due to the grace of God, my family has never been in a position of severe want. Yes, we have (like everyone else) hit some rough spots, but never to the extent of needing to steal for food. That leads us to this...

I was sent a link to this website today. It purportedly shows what happened to an 8 year old boy that was caught stealing a loaf of bread in Iran. Now, if I had been the one to catch the child, I would have probably would have given the child the bread. Seeing anyone that hungry would drive me to act to alleviate that hunger. However, in the world of Sha'ria law, the proper punishment for thievery is to cut off a hand. Given what I saw in those pictures today, I can't decide which would have been more humane....cutting off a child's hand or running over his arm with a JEEP!

Now a commenter to the site in question did state that he was Iranian and that he had seen that on a TV report before and that the child was not being "punished" per se, the adults were making money off of the child doing that!!! The treatment that child received was barbaric and if it was something that was called for by a "religion" then that religion is barbaric. If it was being done to make money off of that child it is even more barbaric and the adults involved should be punished. Sadly, I feel that will not happen.

How a society treats it's most vulnerable, the elderly and the children, says a lot about them and this speaks volumnes about Iran. If the rest of the Middle East is like this (and I know people who have been there and they say that it is) then it just solidifies all the more in my mind, the need for regime change through out the entire region.

Sunday, October 30, 2005

When do we say "ENOUGH"?

When will someone say "ENOUGH" when it comes to going after the families of public figures? During the Vice Presidential debates last year, Senator John Edwards decided that it was germaine to the debate to mention that Vice President Cheney's daughter, Mary, was a lesbian. The Republicans cried "foul" and the Kerry/Edwards campaign defended the remarks. After John Roberts was nominated to the Supreme Court, Democrats and their willing accomplices in the legacy media felt obligated to try to dig into the adoption records of his two children. Now comes this bit of sleaze out of our favorite fishwrap.

Apparently, Doug Grow thinks that the Republicans are against providing support for developmentally disabled people and so it is hypocritical of the Republican State Party Chair to utilize said support. I would challenge Mr. Grow to find me any plank in the Republican Party Platform that says that. Yes, the Minnesota Republican Party platform calls for smaller government and for watching our state budget so that the state can indeed pay for "essential services", but there is NOTHING in the platform that says that aid to developmentally disabled children and their families is a NON essential service.

"But isn't there a conflict between Carey, the leader of a party so resistant to government spending, and Carey, the parent of a child who benefits from public spending?" Grow asks. "But most of us aren't in Carey's shoes. We don't lead political movements so resistant to public spending." Grow states. One very big problem, Mr. Grow......Republicans are against WASTEFUL SPENDING. Are you stating that conservatives think that this is wasteful spending????? Chairman Carey says it best when he says "Government by nature is not bad, it's abuse that's bad. It's waste that's bad."

Autism is one of those afflictions that breaks the hearts of the families involved. I have a relative who has Down's Syndrome and Autism. It is frustrating for everyone in the family because we know that our loved one is in there somewhere and we just don't know how to get him out. To attack a public figure for getting state help for that loved one is unconscionable.

When are we, as a civilized people going to stand up to people like Mr. Edwards and Mr. Grow and say "THIS WILL NOT STAND!" When are we going to say to them that bringing an 8 year old, disabled child into this discussion is completely and utterly unacceptable! When will we stand up and defend our children from this kind of sleaze?

(Hat tip to Doug over at Bogus Gold)