More and more MSM denial
The Guardian (of London) is hardly a "conservative" publication. That is why this 1999 article should be given a second look.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,314700,00.html
In the article, Julian Borger goes right into the dangers of a Hussein/bin Laden alliance:
"Saddam Hussein's regime has opened talks with Osama bin Laden, bringing closer the threat of a terrorist attack using chemical, biological or nuclear weapons, according to US intelligence sources and Iraqi opposition officials. "
Go back and read that again. The talks bring closer the threat of a terrorist attack using "chemical, biological or nuclear weapons" What were those weapons called again????
"News of the negotiations emerged in a week when the US attorney general, Janet Reno, warned the Senate that a terrorist attack involving weapons of mass destruction was a growing concern. "There's a threat, and it's real," Ms Reno said, adding that such weapons "are being considered for use."
Oh yeah - that's right. The weapons that Saddam supposedly didn't have (if you would believe the recent press reports).
Now to be honest, the Guardian goes on to say that they do not know for sure if Osama accepted the Iraqi offer of assylum, an offer that Osama had previously turned down because of his disdain of the secular aspects of Saddam's Baathist regime, however it does conclude with the statement that Osama didn't have many choices......
It astounds me, that someone like me - a working mother of a very active school aged child - can find this information in the limited time that I have and yet no one in the so-called Main Stream Media can find this and they wonder why their circulation and viewship is going down at a rapid rate.....
posted by The Lady Logician at 8:24 PM permalink
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home